<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are Chicago DFA&#8217;s &#8216;hard surfaced&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://southloopdogpac.org/2010/06/why-are-chicago-dfas-hard-surfaced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://southloopdogpac.org/2010/06/why-are-chicago-dfas-hard-surfaced/</link>
	<description>Support your local dog parks!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sldogpac</title>
		<link>http://southloopdogpac.org/2010/06/why-are-chicago-dfas-hard-surfaced/comment-page-1/#comment-1712</link>
		<dc:creator>sldogpac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southloopdogpac.org/?p=1391#comment-1712</guid>
		<description>Chicago Park District policy is to create very small dog areas (about one tenth of an acre) that have to be hard-surfaced so that they can accommodate the large number of dogs in their service areas without turning to muck. 

Seems logical enough. Is it the right policy? 

We don&#039;t have concrete data, yet, but casual observation suggests that far more owners and their dogs are driven away from DFA&#039;s because of this policy than are drawn to using the parks for recreation with their pets. And, when we&#039;ve brought up potential infectious disease risks (e.g. filthy standing water) due to construction defects at the DFAs... we&#039;ve been blown off. 

So, there are contradictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chicago Park District policy is to create very small dog areas (about one tenth of an acre) that have to be hard-surfaced so that they can accommodate the large number of dogs in their service areas without turning to muck. </p>
<p>Seems logical enough. Is it the right policy? </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have concrete data, yet, but casual observation suggests that far more owners and their dogs are driven away from DFA&#8217;s because of this policy than are drawn to using the parks for recreation with their pets. And, when we&#8217;ve brought up potential infectious disease risks (e.g. filthy standing water) due to construction defects at the DFAs&#8230; we&#8217;ve been blown off. </p>
<p>So, there are contradictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://southloopdogpac.org/2010/06/why-are-chicago-dfas-hard-surfaced/comment-page-1/#comment-1711</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southloopdogpac.org/?p=1391#comment-1711</guid>
		<description>I completely agree: this research needs to be questioned.  There should be a group of professionals who look into this and determine whether this &quot;research&quot; is even valid. 

One of many examples of different cities who build dog parks with grass (REAL grass): New Orleans finished a beautiful, nearly all-grass dog park last year: http://www.nolacitybark.org/

There are too many dog parks out there that are all grass, so I can&#039;t imagine that everyone else is doing this wrong and only Chicago is correct. 

I&#039;m upset because I just want my dog to exercise on a grassy area where his paws won&#039;t be torn up.  Montrose dog beach is incredibly crowded and dirty (from the people).  

I literally cannot find a single dog-safe area within a few miles of Chicago that contains grass for my dog to play on.  Is it really too much to ask for?  Am I and the previous poster asking for the moon here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree: this research needs to be questioned.  There should be a group of professionals who look into this and determine whether this &#8220;research&#8221; is even valid. </p>
<p>One of many examples of different cities who build dog parks with grass (REAL grass): New Orleans finished a beautiful, nearly all-grass dog park last year: <a href="http://www.nolacitybark.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nolacitybark.org/</a></p>
<p>There are too many dog parks out there that are all grass, so I can&#8217;t imagine that everyone else is doing this wrong and only Chicago is correct. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m upset because I just want my dog to exercise on a grassy area where his paws won&#8217;t be torn up.  Montrose dog beach is incredibly crowded and dirty (from the people).  </p>
<p>I literally cannot find a single dog-safe area within a few miles of Chicago that contains grass for my dog to play on.  Is it really too much to ask for?  Am I and the previous poster asking for the moon here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Maison</title>
		<link>http://southloopdogpac.org/2010/06/why-are-chicago-dfas-hard-surfaced/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Maison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southloopdogpac.org/?p=1391#comment-503</guid>
		<description>I recently moved to Chicago and this research should be questioned.  I came from MN and there is a large dog park with grass and my sister is a vet who help design the dog park.   I&#039;ll like to see the data behind this.  It seems that these answers were back-ended and not based on science.  If this study is to believed, wouldn&#039;t all dog owners be required to have hard surface back yards?   I&#039;ve lived in several cities and usually travel with my dog and  the vast majority of dog parks surfaces in the US are grass.  Dog parks that have been around a lot longer than Chicago ones!  The problem is that Chicago dog parks are way too small which is why the grass can&#039;t survive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently moved to Chicago and this research should be questioned.  I came from MN and there is a large dog park with grass and my sister is a vet who help design the dog park.   I&#8217;ll like to see the data behind this.  It seems that these answers were back-ended and not based on science.  If this study is to believed, wouldn&#8217;t all dog owners be required to have hard surface back yards?   I&#8217;ve lived in several cities and usually travel with my dog and  the vast majority of dog parks surfaces in the US are grass.  Dog parks that have been around a lot longer than Chicago ones!  The problem is that Chicago dog parks are way too small which is why the grass can&#8217;t survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

